Costs and Success

 

• Companies tend to at least provide computer non-human training courses.

One of the reasons why companies tend to provide effective training course is because of priority. International corporations don't consider training its employees when it comes to international business deals. Companies are known to hire workers overseas since it's least costly. Companies these days are saving more money especially when the economy is bad. So therefore companies just simply provide either online courses or software translation program.

 

 

• At times  time companies do not provide any  learning courses.

There companies are not required to provide any learning courses to newly applied applicants. Companies tend to focus more on efficiency so therefore simply just have applicants learn translation from a computer program.

 

• Computer non-human training courses are the lest successful.

It has been shown for the past fifteen years or so that soley relying on translation software is the most inneffective way of improvement. Translation software cannot keep up with storing memory of new meanings. Also a software does not have the same human ablity to translate different meaning texts.

 

• Both Oral and Lecture translation courses are the most successful.

It has been shown the most successful traning method is applying both combinations of Oral and Lecture translation. People tend to learn it by both seeing and hearing it. Plus there's human internation, rather than interating with a computer. That is one of the proven methods that helps people to become better technical translators. The most succesful translators have the most human interaction.

 

 

• It costs the company more providing effective training courses.

 

Dispite the benefits it is more costly for the company to provide effective training courses to it's employees. The companies should take into consideration that the benefits of training technical translators out weight the risks. What this means is that well trained technical translators are less likely to make mistakes. To date companies have not yet conducted studies based on the effectiveness of how technical translators should be trained. So therefore all of the observations are independent.